So I guess Eric kept his head down and got out of jail early but word got out about his illiteracy so no one explained to him the conditions of his release and he went straight back to Parker to try to get his old job back and they gave it to him and then he was immediately arrested and put back in jail for the remainder of his sentence for trying to empty my bank account. I mentioned before when I was an ESL teacher I was booked by a high level JPM Chase exec and I explained about the Bank One days and how people who were being kicked out of their homes were being deprived of their funds and then they were evicted for non payment of rent very legally and that this had been going on for more than 20 years and that when Chase absorbed Bank One they didn't do any staff changes right away though the last time or two I was in there they all looked like completely new people.
So, at the time the AG had wanted to charge Parker with criminal enterprise but my note to them about suspecting that something was about to happen in an underhanded way to have me removed from my home slipped through the cracks. If he had known I had detailed the conversations I had overheard he could have charged them, but as it was they said it looked like an individual criminal matter. So when I sent them a detailed (like ten pages) explanation of what had started back up about a month after Eric was sent back to jail with them always in my apartment or standing outside my window trash talking me in a racist and sexist way and telling people if I said anything at all or they heard any noise at all, like running water or could tell my tv was on at all or anything to report it immediately and I was talking to them for two months before I got the letter from Parker with no explanation only saying that I wouldn't be allowed to stay past the end of my current lease.
Basically it is illegal to kick out a paying tenant this way, especially without any reason at all but people are used to enforcement being pretty lax, which is why Goat Jack is suing the state because he is required to pay a real estate agent who is licensed by the state even though they do nothing at all of value to him and dont even follow real estate laws and he says if there are no laws why does he have to pay an agent in the first place and doesn't that situation violate a lot of commerce and stuff like that? So they are going to enforce and there is no suitable reason to kick out someone who has never been informed of a lease violation who has always paid.
