These things are still written in Greek or whatever, and I think its still early in the sorting process but I have found phylotree.org anyway. After finding that paper that mentioned the first four mutations and knowing that its highly relevant to have 73 G rather than 73 A even though I have a lot in common with some branches of U there isn't exactly a reversion mark (!) by my 73G even though I also read 50% of people tested so far have 73 G or its on SMFG's greatest hits list.
So, I have to be somewhere above R on the tree. (period).
After that I haven't yet figured out what is definitive though I saw T16362C is the first mentioned mutation in all of D so that gets a check mark. So I'm a D of some sort, but what sort has yet to be determined, however I saw that a lot of other people who had only D and no subclade reference were all the people who had the most in common with me in terms of loci so I'm in the right dog park.
I also found though T16189C! in the branch right before it breaks into D5 but still in D unless I can find another mutation that puts me in a D5 group. I think its just an undeveloped branch of D that hasn't been classified yet that is neither D4 nor D5. Probably not classified for lack of samples in English speaking contexts but there might be information about this in China or Japan or I don't know what people are studying in Mongolia.
