So its getting kinda too cold to walk much and Xoxo says my upper body looks weak so I'm spending more time just poking through the online resources about genetics and starting with mitochondria. Today I learned a chronological mutation order regarding four of the genes I have which seems to mean that I am above R on the line from mitochondrial Eve which I already knew. Anyway a woman I was reading said that 263 G was first, insertion at 315.1 C was second, 73 G happened third and 16519 C happened fourth. She was writing about haplogroup K but I lost her there and had no further mutations in common. When I searched those four on SMFG.Org I got about a hundred people with all those loci.
My searching isn't particularly methodical, I think of a search term, maybe find a paper, maybe it has links in its foot notes, maybe I learn a word or two that are useful in the future and I have nothing else to do with my time anyway. But I think today's searching was extremely fruitful.
One thing I noticed about the U2 results was that none of them had 73 G and that they had lumped me into a group where all the members were a specific U2 subclade that the U2 public results group didn't post, and they didn't let my results post there either, and when we were all given a free trial of Ancestry.com and we all compared our results from our "match" group, there were a lot of differences between us and I was the most different again with specific racist stigmatizing mutations that caused a kerfluffle especially since one lady had been emailing me for information like we might be related but when we compared our actual results there was no fucking way in a hundred thousand years (ok maybe only about 50 thousand years).
Anyway, I keep flipping back and forth between this post and looking things up, figured out what RSRS is about, CVR really upsetting me anyway, because I think its Chucky's genes and I really don't like comparing myself as a "mutant" compared to that guy but the RSRS seems to have more to do with mutations from the origin though I only skimmed the article. It completely changes the loci I have to look up but it makes it easier to see what is relevant.
I'm still searching only in english and only among primarilly european populations or english speaking people and this is limiting my sense of statistical normality of my own results.
I was also remember a conversation with other real genetic family members that we do actually have some change back genes in common or analagous mutations like both birds and dragon flies have wings sort of thing with some groups that have too many differences from us on the deeper levels to be relatives, I think if I get things right HVR 2 mutates more slowly than HVR 1 but I'm not a hundred percent sure on that only that I find a lot more matches with people on HVR 2 than I do in HVR 1.
*at this point I've sorted out that what I have in common the most often with people in Haplogroup D is T16187C, G16230A, T16278C, C16311T, T16362C and C146T, C195T, A247G, 522.1A, 522.2C, 309.1C, 315.1C, and though I don't have A16129G but instead A16129C and not everyone has 309.1C but a lot of people do, I'm certain I am in the D group somewhere*
**well almost certain, there might be info somewhere about that G rather than C but certainly not T that would put me somewhere else, but I looked at some B's and C's and was nowhere near as matchy to them or anyone else as I am to D and again I'm probably really from Mars to begin with**
